1 Nephi 2:15–16 Textual Variants

Royal Skousen
it must needs be that there was an opposition even the forbidden fruit in opposition to the tree of life the one being sweet and the other bitter wherefore the Lord God gave unto man that he should act for himself wherefore man could not act for himself save it should be that he were enticed by the one or the other

If one interprets this passage as a strict parallelism, it implies that the forbidden fruit was sweet while the tree of life was bitter. This seems strange because elsewhere in the text, sweet lines up with positives, bitter with negatives:

In the first example, we have the words evil, darkness, and bitter opposed to good, light, and sweet. In the second example, the words bitter and pains are set against sweet and joy.

As far as 2 Nephi 2:15 is concerned, readers would normally assume that the tree of life was sweet and the forbidden fruit was bitter. One could imagine switching the word order; there are two possible emendations:

These two emendations presume that the order of reference must be preserved. Ultimately, the question is whether one and other necessarily maintain order. There is only one example for which the order is clearly maintained:

Yet this passage continues by using other a second time, but this time in reference to the first of the pair (that is, in reference to righteousness and happiness):

Another example of a reversal is in a Matthew quotation:

In this last example, we see that “the one” is followed by “the other”, even if the referent switches. One could therefore interpret 2 Nephi 2:15 so that “the one” refers to the tree of life and “the other” refers to the forbidden fruit, thus preserving the use of sweet with positives and bitter with negatives.

It should also be noted here that for all other uses of “(the) one … (the) other”, no specific order is implied or even necessary. In all these instances, we get simply a contrast or an unordered opposition:

Summary: Maintain the original order in 2 Nephi 2:15, but interpret “the one” as referring to the tree of life and “the other” as referring to the forbidden fruit; usage elsewhere suggests that referents for “the one” and “the other” can be reversed.

Analysis of Textual Variants of the Book of Mormon, Part. 1

References